A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving possible neighbours above the construction of a wall in a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted countrywide consideration following an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members dwelling at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier and the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed into a extremely publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, search for to create their spouse and children residence. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, where progress pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of established citizens. Based on the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by developing a wall further than the boundaries of their internet site, resulting in an encroachment over a Particular Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result parts are subject to rigid controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, notably inside a delicate coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly crafted, is in the right placement. Their lawful crew has characterised the motion as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their check out, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image that has because become emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they were intended to Acquire Visible evidence on the wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water for the duration of serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the internet site turned one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely famous that these steps had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to be familiar with the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on whether interim orders should be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant inside the authorized timeline.
Within the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has long been described as meticulous in his examination of preparing paperwork, maps, and disorders connected on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is enthusiastic by concern for environmental safety and adherence to planning regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have got explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically attempting to establish a spouse and children dwelling in accordance Along with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Exclusive Space of Conservation and say that every one functions have been performed according to Experienced tips and accepted ideas. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea through a storm, usually do not change the underlying info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around development of wall at coastal web-site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition that many observers see as significantly common. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions post about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to regional advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from very various Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-large water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Times and René Collier waded as a result of waistline-superior water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical fact of the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays unsure. The court docket need to decide whether or not the wall as created complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling conditions. But the human factor stays central: neighbours who need to Dwell alongside each other very long after the authorized prices have been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, even so the implications of the case increase beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the value of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. Furthermore, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential issues for example environmental protection and house rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of normal magnificence and contested boundaries. The Paul Feely wall at the centre with the dispute stands partially created, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Irrespective of whether it can in the end be altered, removed, or concluded as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.